@kris-tally @cameron-tally
As we have all been informed by Cameron, there is no negligence at the company and any bugs are found after going live. They are not regularly pointed out by the customers, apparently they are found by the company.
With that apparent statement of fact by the CEO, in mindā¦
Both my parents closed their accounts due to not using it much and the minimum charges eating up what little they did have in there. Personally, I donāt have a problem with the minimum charge as it does remove these dead accounts (not that tally can afford to lose customers).
When I found out my Dad had closed his account a few weeks prior to telling me, I was surprised (actually I wasnāt) to see he was still in my list of people I could send tally to⦠So I tried to, and guess what, I was able to see accounts for people that had closed their accounts and I was also able to send tally to these accounts that didnāt exist. The person whoās account it used to belong to, didnāt get the payment but the transfer was still able to be done. So, where did this payment go to?
I made the payment on the 20th July 2025 of 100 tally to my dad who had closed his account a few weeks previous, to test it. Obviously I wasnāt surprised by yet another massive issue with tally so thought Iād give them the benefit of doubt and wait to see if this payment to nowhere was picked up on the end of month account consolidation. Obviously it wasnāt and is still floating around, who knows where! A simple internal ledger transaction to a dead account not even picked up by this āfantastic 7 years old alternative mainstream monetary systemā.
So my questions are.
- When the management of the company and the designers of the super duper teko back-end sat down to plan this āupgradeā, why did they make a conscious decision to leave the payee account details visible and allow their customers the ability to transfer to an account that no longer existed?
- Why are the accounts not consolidated each month to check for anomalies such as this so they can be rectified, as Iām pretty sure every other bank or financial institution does?
- Why isnāt a simple cron job set up to run at least every 12 hours to purge these dead accounts from the front end to prevent this happening?
If this isnāt negligence of the company and poor design of the code but is a feature they have thought about and implemented, then I would like some answers. This isnāt even a bug, this is negligent design code and a complete lack of a common sense approach.
If tally canāt keep a tally of the tally in the tally accounts, I think itās time to rename the company or educate some of the staff on what the word tally actually means in this context.
I am currently looking for somewhere to start depositing several hundred thousand pounds for the purchase of a property. Tally would have been the ideal place for this due to the insurance covering the gold of any amount, but the problem is, the company has spent 7 years getting slowly worse and has completely destroyed my trust in its ability to provide even the most basic account requirements. At this point, I am actually too scared to deposit large sums into the account of a company I hold shares in.
What a pathetically laughable situation this has become, with this companies inability to see or acknowledge itās own massive flaws in the management and design.
P.S.
Feel free to send the 100 tally back to my account if you ever manage to track it down, now Iāve pointed it out.